holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)


Ecosystem Services Come to Town: Greening Cities by Working with Nature
Gary Grant
Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex and Ames, Iowa, 2012

This book would be a good introduction to the ecological problems of cities and to the proposed solutions of restoring ecological services.

It begins by summarizing the history of cities and how they came to be what they are today. It moves on to looking at various ways of improving the forest, watershed, and natural functions of cities. It would be a good introduction to these subjects, as it brings together many different threads and thoughts that I’ve encountered elsewhere. In fact, the nice wide margins and complete citation on the title page of every chapter make it practically designed to be made into PDFs by a professor for individual reading assignments.

Given the publisher and cost, I was expecting something more technical than it was, so having said all the above, I found it a little disappointing.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (Default)

Rambunctious Garden by Emma Marris, 2012

This book looks at the historical antecedents of the idea of wilderness, and how that has affected conservation today.

There really is nowhere in the world that is “pristine” wilderness, because global warming has reached into every corner. But even before the effects of global warming were known, the idea of pristine wilderness frequently eliminated the Native Americans who had lived their before — as the Miwok Indians were evicted from Yellowstone when it was made a national park.

Some groups, like the Washington Native Plant Society among many others, set a baseline of European colonization, picking different years for different parts of the continent — 1850 for Washington. But the idea of a baseline is itself based on an old, outdated concept on the processes of ecology; that is, that an ecological zone proceeded along a steady path to a climax state, as in the old idea of climax forest. That’s been pretty thoroughly disproven, but a lot of practices started when that idea held sway are still being carried out. For instance, the idea of an 1850 baseline ignores the fur trappers, who were decades earlier, and who wiped out the beaver, which drastically affected the waterways of the region. Not to mention smallpox, which arrived even earlier.

But the invalidity of the idea of a baseline or of pristine wilderness does not mean we should pave over everything. Rather, it gives us the freedom to bring nature closer to us, to see that the separation of nature and the built environment is itself a false distinction, and one we should get rid of as soon as possible. This is the same point that Lyanda Lynn Haupt makes in Crow Planet: nature is everywhere, and the sooner we realize that, the sooner we can change our lifestyles and habits and awareness.

As I type this, I’m less than halfway through the book, so there is probably a lot more to learn about. But I was thinking that “Rambunctious Garden” is complementary to “Crow Planet” and that the former is likely to be as influential on my work as the latter. That may be overburdening Rambunctious Garden with false expectations, but I hope not.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

Cedar: Tree of Life to the Northwest Coast Indians
Hilary Stewart
University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1995

The Western Red Cedar (Thuja Plicata) was so useful to Coastal Salish people that they said it was the reincarnation of a man who was helpful to everyone. When someone needed, he gave; when someone hungered, he fed. His reward was to be made the Western Red Cedar, which was used for clothing, shelter, transportation, storage, and ceremony.

The bark was used for clothing; the wood for storage, planks for longhouses, and canoes for transportation; the withes were used for rope; the roots for baskets. A coastal Salish person would use some aspect of the cedar literally from cradle to grave.

Stewart’s book looks at each part of the tree and its uses in depth. The words are accompanied by detailed line drawings of tools that worked the wood and the uses it was put to. You might not be able to go and build a cedar plank house, but you could probably describe the process well enough for a novel. And you certainly have a greater idea of how important the tree was, and how many people making a canoe or a house required. Or how the baskets were woven.

I found the amount of detail intimidating, in fact, which isn’t Stewart’s fault at all. This would probably be a better book for reading the specific section that interested you, or as a reference in a paper. The material is presented at a writing level that would make it appropriate for high school or undergraduate research.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

The Golden Spruce: A True Story of Myth, Madness, and Greed
John Vaillant
W.W. Norton & Company, 2005

The Golden Spruce in 1984.
Photo by Mike Beaureguard, from Wikimedia Commons

The Golden Spruce was an anomalous tree that should not have survived, but did, for hundreds of years. Its outer needles were too pale to photosynthesize properly, and its inner needles were too shaded to have received enough light. Yet it lived and prospered for hundreds of years, a tree of ancient legend to the Haida when Europeans arrived in the 18th century.

To tell the story of the Golden Spruce and its eventual destruction, Vaillant combines threads of history, ecology, biography, journalism, and economics without losing pace or losing track of the plot. One question he asks (and makes a good case for) is whether forestry or agriculture made a greater change on the face of the planet. Removal of the forest, after all, has to come first.

And he describes the rapacious destruction of the Pacific Northwest rainforest in truly harrowing terms. It’s not just that the forests were clearcut, but that trees considered commercially valueless (such as Western Red-cedar) were chopped down and thrown aside. The most accessible areas in the British Columbia rainforest were on steep river slopes, resulting in massive erosion.

Until late in the 20th century, the British Columbia rainforest was considered nearly infinite, that it would never be completely logged. It is only recently that we are at last slowing down. Vaillant gives us the details of the logging industry, and the effects it has on the people who work in it and live in the areas affected by it, without editorializing, letting their words and objective descriptions speak for themselves.

Grant Hadwin was one of the people working in the logging industry. He could (and did) go into the forest with nothing but matches and coffee and survive for weeks. His job was to plan roads to logging areas. At the time he did this, it was truly independent, with little or no oversight. But he came to despise the logging industry, became unemployable, tried to make a living at other occupations but the constraints of civilization were too tight.

He focused on the Golden Spruce — allowed to live in a memorial ten-acre patch — as a symbol of all that had gone wrong with the industry. He cut it down in January, 1997, in an evening raid that included swimming across a near-freezing river and climbing a steep bank. The job was considered expert by all who saw it.

Attempts to grow the spruce from cuttings were unsuccessful. Grant Hadwin disappeared on his way to trial. There is much, much more in this book.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

Wild Plants of Greater Seattle 2ND Edition
by Arthur Lee Jacobson
Second Edition, 2008

If Pojar is a forest steward’s main reference for botanizing, then Jacobson (as it’s called) is the other reference. Whereas Pojar is focused strictly on native plants (with a few endemic weeds, like Himalayan blackberry), Jacobson attempts to catalog, as completely as possible, any and all plants that might be commonly found growing wild in Seattle, whether native or introduced.

What is a native plant, after all? What is a “weed”? Jacobson spends some time discussing this. A weed can be any plant in a place you don’t want it to be. Or, a weed can be a plant that colonizes disturbed areas, or has an aggressive growth pattern, or attempts to establish a monoculture. These characteristics have little to do with whether a plant was in this region (the Puget Trough) before 1850 (European colonization), the common definition of “native” plant. Strictly speaking the Port Orford cedar in North Beach Park is a nonnative, even though it comes from the coastal temperate rain forest. When does a plant become a “native”? Some introduced plants play well with others, so to speak. They provide food and habitat, and don’t attempt to establish a monoculture. Still, there are weeds and introduced plants at ever level of the forest canopy. Some are higher priority (ivy) than others (European ash).

“Wild Plants of Greater Seattle” is organized following the standard classification for general plant books — from coniferous trees down to ferns and horsetails. Each plant is explained in detail on the left-side page, with an accompanying line illustration on the right-side page. Identification notes are given, descriptions of the flowers and the months it’s likely to bloom. Edibility or medicinal uses of the plant are mentioned if important, although the ethnobotanical notes are not quite as complete as in Pojar.

Plants are indexed by common names only; when a plant has several common names, they’re all listed. The latin names are given after the common names. One section of the book that particularly appeals to me is “Where the Wild Plants Are: 21 habitats and their typical plants.” The habitats listed include “cracks, nooks, crannies in streets, sidewalks, and by buildings;” “heavy industry warehouse districts, freight yards;” “railroad track margins;” and the more-expected “Woods — coniferous; usually dominated by native groundcovers.” When I first read that, I thought it would be a great project to explore the city, and photograph native plants in very unexpected places. (I still do, but if it sparks your interest, feel free to go ahead.) Pineapple weed in a sidewalk crack is the very idea of nature intruding where we don’t expect it.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska
Lone Pine Publishers, Vancouver, BC, 2004

This book is the go-to book for plant identification in this area. It’s called simply “Pojar” in the field and it’s not uncommon, when working with forest native plant stewards, to see two people thumbing through their Pojars, with other people looking over their shoulders.

It’s distinguished by its completeness, everything from trees through nearly-microscopic mosses and lichens. All plants that can be, as much as possible, considered native (ie, existed here before the European incursion) to this region (from Eugene, OR in the south to Cook Inlet, AK in the north; the Pacific in the west to the inland mountains to the east). There are a few weeds and naturalized plants, but not many. Every plant has at least one photo (frequently two), a range map, and a line drawing. Every plant is also discussed in five brief sections: General, an overall description of the plant; Leaves, a description of the leafing and branching pattern; Flowers, a description of the flowers; Fruits, a description of the seeds; Ecology, the range and habitat of the plant; and Notes, information of special interest about a plant. Some of the headings for a section might change; for instance, grasses have an Inflorescence section, but not a flower or fruits section.

The Notes section is particularly interesting, as it contains ethnobotanic information detailing how various peoples used the plants, whether for food, building material, clothing, or medicine. The Notes section will also compare a given plant to similar plants in the same family.

However, Pojar can be intimidating and opaque to the beginner. It becomes more useful to me as I learn more about plants, and have a general idea of what something might be but need to pin it down. This is why you might find two people looking through their copies, looking up different possibilities for the plant in hand. Because it remains useful even to plant experts, it’s worth digging into and grappling with to understand. Something that might make it more useful would be tables of plant communities by habitat.

Another problem, especially in the city, is that the definition of “native” plant is pretty strict. This means that I can spend a fair amount of time looking something up in Pojar, only to realize it’s not listed.

Given these minor complaints, this is still the most useful all-around guide for native plants available.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

Salmon in the Trees: Life in Alaska’s Tongass Rain Forest [With CD (Audio)]
Photography by Amy Gulick
Illustrations by Ray Troll
Braided River, 2010

The Pacific Northwest temperate rain forest extended from Mendocino County up to Anchorage, Alaska. It was larger than all the other temperate rain forests combined. You don’t think of Scotland, northern Japan, Chile, or Norway as having rain forests, but they all once did.

The southeast Alaska Panhandle, the northern coast of British Columbia, and all the archipelagos off their shores, are the largest surviving intact temperate rain forests in the world. This book deals with the Tongass rain forest in Alaska.

Even when being set aside as a national forest, the trees were made available to logging companies at dirt-sale prices; one article says a tree would be sold as raw lumber for the cost of a cheeseburger. Economics have weakened the pulp industry, and, in the way of extractive industries, the companies have fired the workers, closed the mills, and moved on.

What is left though is still intact enough to survive and is the largest national parks and national forests in the country.

This book shows us what remains in essays and photographs that made me want to go there. The Tongass rain forest is one of the wildest places on Earth. The essays range from rapturous homilies to the beauty of the landscape, to reports on research being conducted in conservation and ecology.

All in all, it sounds like a magical place. Burgeoning with life, all connected and living together. The essays show in great detail, with many different starting points, why this area is worth preserving. And not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because sustainable practices of fishing and forestry will provide longer-term employment than clear-cutting. Douglas Chadwick points out that a giant spruce, sold as raw lumber for the price of a cheeseburger, is worth tens of thousands of dollars when milled carefully to produce sounding boards for music instruments.

There are sidebar interviews with people who make their living in the Tongass — giving flying and boating tours, fishing tours and hikes, doing research. The photos are beautiful, adding to the information in the essays. I think the illustrations could have been reproduced a little larger — they look like “design elements” rather than an integrated part of the whole.

Salmon in the Trees was produced by the Mountaineers to bring knowledge and appreciation of the Tongass to people who might not have heard of it otherwise. I think it succeeds.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

The Wild Trees: A Story of Passion and Daring
Richard Preston

Studying the tree canopy of redwoods is a new field, developed in the last twenty-five years or so. The Wild Trees chronicles that development, focusing on the personalities of the people driven to search for the tallest trees in the world, and then to climb them to see what’s up there.

The personalities are interesting, it’s true. Finding the tallest tree in the world isn’t enough of a driving interest to receive funding, so the initial research is done on the weekends by a convenience store clerk. However, his persistence in this search brings him into contact with others, such as Stephen Sillett, and together they discover a completely new world.

It used to be thought that forest canopies were just the leaves and branches of the trees, maybe some bird nests, but nothing very interesting. Just about every canopy, at every level, is a startlingly diverse ecosystem. Preston compares the experience of the original tree climbers to that of Jacques Cousteau, discovering a new world with his scuba equipment.

A redwood tree might looks like one straight stem from the ground, but a tall tree will send out several trunks as it reaches its height. And if a windstorm breaks off one of those leaders or sub-trunks, new trunks sprout in its place. The broken trunk might get caught in branches and never reach the ground. Over time, the new growth around it will fuse with it. Dirt accumulates in the joins of the multiple trunks; in this dirt, bryophytes and epiphytes start to grow. And, somehow (the mechanism isn’t known yet) copepods from the ocean live up there, as well as salamanders.

Considering how patchy the redwood forest remnants are, it’s a little staggering to think what what the canopy might have been before logging. How much more massively complex the redwood canopy must have been, when it could have stretched unbroken for miles. Even so, it’s possible to walk from tree to tree in some cases. Wisely, the exact locations are kept secret and only a few biologists and tree scientists know them.

One of the main discoveries of people researching possibly the largest organisms on this planet involves one of the smallest organisms: The role that a small lichen, Lobaria, plays in the fertility of the canopy and the forest as a whole. The lichen is prominent in very old Pacific Northwest forests, but it can take thousands of years for it to grow and spread through a canopy. This means that even relatively old forests (a few hundred years, and currently considered old growth) might not yet be at their ecological climax.

The book is described as “narrative nonfiction,” which means Preston uses some of the story telling tools of fiction to build an arc. And there were times when I felt genuine tension in reading the book. I can guess the general circumstances of even a very well-done thriller, but there were times reading this book I had no idea how an event would turn out. We’re carried through the lives, loves, and losses of all the people involved in this research.

Having said that, I’d have liked the book to focus more on the science and a little less on the personalities. At least a guide for further reading (or viewing — there have been TV documentaries about Sillett and canopy research). I liked that scientific research isn’t all glamorous (particularly anything involving Australian leech forests) and that scientists sometimes have messy personalities. But I would have liked more about the canopy itself.

Bonus! Here is a TED talk by Richard Preston about climbing in the redwoods.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

Crow Planet

Aug. 3rd, 2012 11:33 am
holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

Crow Planet: Essential Wisdom from the Urban Wilderness
By Lyanda Lynn Haupt
Little, Brown and Company
New York, 2009

I read Crow Planet in December, 2010, during my first quarter break at Antioch. It resonated deeply with me, articulating ideas I had only half-thought out: about the city, nature, the interconnections between them, and our connectedness to them. It opened a doorway to other authors and influenced the direction of my studies.

Rereading it now, two years later and at the end of my BA, a circle has been completed. I’ve taken in some ideas of this book so deeply they feel natural, as if I’ve always had them. I remember individual turns of phrases, eloquent aphorisms. But I’ve also forgotten important lessons it offers about observing nature in the city, which in many cases is the study of the very obvious – crows, moss, weeds.

Crows’ intelligence and omnivorous diet has allowed them to prosper from human disruption of the environment. Their problem solving ability has been well documented, and so has their ability to recognize individual humans. It’s also likely that you’ve seen them play in high winds, swooping and diving. They’ve been observed sitting with a dying crow in a crow hospice and mourning the dead. They eat French fries as avidly as they eat roadkill. It’s pretty likely that crows will adapt to whatever humans do to the planet.

Which brings us to one of the main points of Crow Planet: their wildness and proximity can allow us to draw a connection between our cities and nature, a connection that for whatever reason we ignore. As Haupt points out, global warming means there is no place on the world unaffected by humanity. Conversely, there is no place where nature does not intrude; there is no crack in the asphalt that doesn’t have a weed growing through it.

This is a very important time to reacquaint ourselves with the connection between us and the world. Haupt explains that there are two Greek words for time: chronos, which means the regular succession of time (as in “chronology). There is also kairos, “‘the appointed time,’ an opportune moment, even a time of crisis, that creates an opportunity for, and in fact demands, a human response. … We live in such a time now, when our collective actions over the next several years will decide whether earthly life will continue its descent into ecological ruin and death or flourish in beauty and diversity.” (7)

Crows provide the opportunity to see the wildness and wild life that abounds in the city – that the city, in fact, is a zoöpolis, a meeting of zoo and polis, and is far from tame. This wild life might be thinner than in old growth forests, but it is inescapable. And it’s not only that nature and the built environment are entwined, but that the borders are permeable – from mud tracked into the house or a fly that came in through a window, to a hurricane flooding a city. “We are incapable of isolation. Every time we sip wine, feed the cat, order pizza, watch Survivor, every time we do anything, anything at all, we are brushing, however surreptitiously, however beneath our awareness –however, even, against our will – a wilder, natural world. Such awareness is simultaneously daunting and beautiful. It means that everything we do matters, and matters wondrously. More than we thought, more than we can even know.” (122-123)

It’s impossible to be isolated from nature, even in the densest urban environment: On a recent tour of the NuCor steel plant (West Seattle) I saw a scraggly bodleia bush, dusty blooms hanging heavily (I thought it was beautiful). It’s also impossible to be isolated from people, even in the most remote environment. Who made the 3 ounce tent you sleep in? Who made the freeze dried food you eat? Who made the water purifiers?

Haupt says this connectedness can be a mystical experience, and I agree with her. It can truly take you out of your skin and into something bigger, something wholly other, uncaring but containing everything. Being aware of this connectedness, and how much damage we’ve done to it, can bring one to a sense of deep despair. But this isn’t just a time of doom and gloom, this is also a time of kairos.

This opportune moment can lead to great despair – I’ve felt it. It carries an awful weight, as the doom’n’gloom scenarios become increasingly relentless. But Haupt chooses to dwell in possibility, to make room for it, to see her contributions as valuable. And that’s the path Crow Planet has inspired me to walk as well, however well or poorly I might.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

Whelks to Whales: Coastal Marine Life of the Pacific Northwest
Newly Revised and Expanded Second Edition
Rick M. Harbo
Harbour Publishing Co., Ltd., 2011
Madeira Park, BC

The first edition of Whelks to Whales has been our go-to reference for all the strange and colorful creatures we find in tide pools. We usually bring it with us on our expeditions and look at it as soon as possible.

The second edition is larger by more than 80 pages. Particularly of interest to us was a new section on egg cases, which allowed us to specify the squid egg mass as being those of the opal squid. That alone was reason enough to snap it up.

In addition to the new section, the book as a whole is better designed and laid out, with a more readable typeface. Many species have new information, whether updated population surveys (the first edition was published in 1999), new research data, or a more detailed description. There were also new species in almost every section I checked.

The photographs are largely the same, but they were good in the first edition. However, there were many different and new photographs, and not just of new species.

All in all, this is a genuine revision and update, and well worth buying even if you have the first edition.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (Default)

An American Exodus: A Record of Human Erosion
by Dorothea Lange and Paul Schuster Taylor

In his essay in The Heart and Mind of a Photographer, A.D. Coleman focuses exclusively on An American Exodus. He says that its layout and design presage many of the design elements we see today on the web, and that documentary photographers working today could do well to find a facsimile of the first edition and examine it in depth.

Well, the Seattle Public Library has a copy on their reference shelves. During Lange’s lifetime, there was only the one edition. There have been a couple facsimile reprints of the first edition, sometimes with new accompanying essays. After Lange died, Paul Schuster Taylor produced a second edition, but it was revised and reorganized. It’s in the first edition (or facsimile reproductions) that we see their statement in its most clear and direct form.

It was not the first work to combine photos and text about the Depression and Dust Bowl. There had been Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, with text by James Agee and photos by Walker Evans; and You Have Seen Their Faces, with text by Erskine Caldwell and photos by Margaret Bourke-White. But this was the first to feature actual direct quotes from the subjects photographed, and deep socioeconomic analysis from Paul Taylor.

I felt this was the distilled essence of Lange’s photography. That, although not the best reproductions of her work (given 1930s printing technology vs. today’s), this was the purest form of her work I’d seen. The book itself does indeed presage design techniques now common, and I agree with A.D. Coleman that it’s worth studying. Unfortunately, I got so wrapped up in it I forgot to take notes.

The endpapers are a stream of quotes from people they interviewed, printed in all caps, without attribution. They flow across the endpapers in a way that reminds me of Jenny Holzer or Barbara Kruger. Each chapter focuses on a different region, working westward. The chapters start out with photos and brief captions, followed by an analysis from Paul Taylor. Another element distinguishing “An American Exodus” is their use of newspaper facsimiles and reprints. A newspaper ad extolling the depth and fertility of the soil of the Oklahoma panhandle, saying the farmer could be living a life of ease in just a few short years, is followed by a photograph of the dustbowl captioned simply “Thirteen years later.”

I got a better sense of the interplay of elements in the catastrophe from Taylor’s words than I had from other reading I’ve done about the dust bowl (admittedly, not very much). It wasn’t just the drought, it wasn’t just the mechanization of farming from mule to tractor. Also involved were farmers taking payments from the government for crop reduction, part of which should have gone to their tenants and sharecroppers. Instead, most farmers used the money to buy tractors and kick the sharecroppers and tenants off the land.


Tractored out, Childress County Texas, June 1938
Photo by Dorothea Lange

All the farmers moved gradually west, until they wound up in the central valley of California. Here they were met by large farms that were already industrial, already mechanized except for the planting and harvesting. When labor was needed, it was needed by the thousands — Lange and Taylor reproduce an ad saying “1000s of cotton pickers needed.” The farms there had already been using Philipino, Japanese, and Mexican migrant labor for decades. Now they were flooded by displaced white people as well.

Paul Schuster Taylor made a graphic representation of the migrant labor flow: An outline map of the US, the tributaries of the flow start further to the north and east than I had expected them to. But they build across the south, as the streams unite through Texas and Oklahoma, until they become a vast sideways river dumping into California. The sudden influx of labor drove down the already near-starvation wages.

And what happened to the migrants after the harvest? They had to choose between food and gas money. The car was necessary to follow the work, but there was never enough money for food and car maintenance both. If the crop failed, or if they arrived too late for a place, they were stuck.

The final chapter of the book makes suggestions for reform, calls for action. But you know, I couldn’t read it. I was already pretty wrung out by the sustained reading of the previous chapters, and I thought that reading the suggestions made in 1939, ignored completely or only half-executed, would have been too much.

NOTE: Since I’m working without Coleman’s essay at hand for reference, I may have either misquoted or unintentionally plagiarized. My apologies.

Here’s another article on An American Exodus, from the University of Virginia’s American Studies program. And here is a contemporary review of the book, by Paul Strand.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (picture icon iv)

Mr. Bristol’s Barn (with excerpts from Mr. Blinn’s Diary)
John Szarkowski
Harry N. Abrams, New York

You might not know it, but John Szarkowski has influenced how you look at photographs. During the decades he was curator at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, he brought to the foreground such photographers as Lee Friendlander, Garry Winogrand, Diane Arbus, William Eggleston, and many others.

After he retired, he returned to his own photography. His own work is nearly the opposite of the photographers above, about as far removed from the snapshot aesthetic, decisive moment, urban, 35mm street photography as it’s possible to get.

Mr. Bristol’s Barn was his first post-retirement publication. It features 33 duotone photographs of an old timber barn on the Connecticut farm he retired to. The barn was built about the time of the Civil War, and followed a construction style old even then. As Szarkowski says in his introduction:

The frame of a timber barn … was made from the trunks of trees, fashioned to a degree of reulartity with ax and adze and two-handled drawknife, and fastened together by mortise and tenon and wooden pegs. There were no standardized parts, and every joint was a special case. The buildings were expensive in terms of the material they used, the time they took to build, and the cost of the skilled mecahnics who tailored them, but this was not understood until something cheaper was available.

Living with the barn for years, Szarkowski had plenty of time to study it, get to see it in many different types of light, all different seasons. These large format, long exposure, low contrast, wide tonal range photographs reveal every detail of the ancient wood. But the details aren’t laid bare, as if on an examination table. They’re brought forward to us, for study, with a fondness and affection. It’s almost as if Szarkowski were standing next to us, and we could talk about the people who built the barn, who farmed the poor land (good for forests, too rocky and rolling for more than subsistence farming). The excerpts from Mr. Blin’s diary add a voice as well. Mr. Blin and Mr. Bristol were neighbors, and may have been acquainted. The diary talks of the hard, never ending work, the distant Civil War, and going to church.

I come back to how different these photographs are than the work he promoted as curator at MOMA. I like these photographs, but find the work of the photographers in my first paragraph more challenging. I want to engage in their dialogue, whether I take pictures like them or not, whether their influence is directly visible in my photography or not.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

Profile

holyoutlaw: (Default)
holyoutlaw

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags