holyoutlaw: (me meh)

Description

Figure 1: The South Slope

North is to the top. (Source: Green Seattle Partnership Reference Map on ArcGIS.com.)

North is to the top. (Source: Green Seattle Partnership Reference Map on ArcGIS.com.)

The South Slope is the slope just north of the South Plateau. It connects the main body of the park with the South Plateau. The northern border of the South Slope is the south loop social trail to the west and the Headwaters Bowl to the east. The southern border is a mixture property lines and the South Plateau.

Some trees in the South Slope have received ivy survival rings. There has been some planting at the lower reaches of the east section of the South Slope, along the border to the Headwaters Bowl. Other than that, the South Slope has received little or no attention.

The South Slope is split by a very steep social trail that connects the South Plateau to the rest of the park. During the dry months, this trail is very fragile and breaks into powder. During the rainy months, it is more stable but also more slick. The two sides of the trail also have different water regimes and different levels of invasive species. Because of this, the trail splits the South Slope into two subareas. This is the only HMU subdivision not based on who can do the work.

The lower reaches of Subarea A (Figure 2, below) are accessible to forest stewards. The trailside reaches of Subarea B are accessible to all volunteers. These are very small sections in the South Slope. Because the South Slope has the steepest slopes in the park, the vast majority of it is accessible only to Natural Area Crew.

The South Slope has less than 1% conifer cover and no observed regeneration of any trees. The canopy is mostly Acer macrophyllum, with 75% percent cover.

The target forest type for the South Slope is Tsuga heterophylla – Pseudotsuga menziesii/Polystichum munitum – Dryopteris expansa (Western hemlock – Douglas fir/Sword fern – Spreading wood fern; TSHE-PSME/POMU-DREX). The reference ecosystem is Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest.

Water Flow

Subarea A (Figure 2, below) is above a number of seeps in the Headwaters Bowl that feed into the stream. These seeps flow over gleyed soils. Water and soil movement has been observed in these seeps even in high summer. The slopes above the seeps might receive some attention from the Stewardship Grant, but most attention will focus on the Headwaters Bowl and the Central Valley (as discussed in Stewardship Grant).

Subarea B receives the run off from the South Plateau. It is critical that we explore this area during a heavy rain. There is evidence that the run off from the South Plateau is eroding a section of the south loop social trail and affecting the immediately adjacent section of the Central Valley. How the runoff is affecting the slope, underneath the ivy, needs to be examined. Please see Uplands and Slopes: South Plateau and Water Flow: South Plateau Street Runoff for further discussions of water flow issues affecting the South Slope.

Vegetation

To the west side of the trail (left in the figure below), the South Slope is heavily invaded, with mature Alnus Rubra (Red alder) and Acer Macrophyllum (Big leaf maple) standing above a near-monoculture of Hedera helix (ivy). There is some remnant Polystichum munitum (Sword fern) and a stand of Rubus parviflorus (Thimbleberry).

On the east side of the trail, the section bordering the Headwaters Bowl and the Olympic Terrace properties is less invaded. The canopy mixture is the same, with more sword fern. This area has received some planting during restoration work. There is still a low diversity of native plants.

There has been no systematic plant survey in the South Slope HMU. Table 1, below, lists those plants that have been observed growing there through casual observation or have been planted during restoration activities. It also includes plants listed in the target forest type description but not observed or planted.

Table 1: Vegetation in the South Slope

Scientific Name Common Name Inv TFT So. Slope
Abies grandis Grand Fir   1  
Acer circinatum Vine maple   1  
Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple   1 G
Alnus rubra Red Alder   1 G
Athyrium filix-femina Lady Fern   1  
Blechnum spicant Deer Fern   1  
Bromus vulgaris Columbia brome   1  
Carex deweyana Dewey’s sedge   1  
Cicerbita muralis Wall lettuce 1   G
Corylus cornuta Beaked Hazelnut   1  
Daphne laureola Spurge Laurel 1   G
Dryopteris expansa Spiny Wood Fern   1  
Galium triflorum Sweet-scented bedstraw   1  
Gaultheria shallon Salal   1  
Geranium robertianum Herb robert 1   G
Hedera helix English Ivy 1   G
Ilex aquifolium English Holly 1   G
Lapsana communis Nipplewort 1   G
Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon-grape   1 G
Polystichum munitum Sword Fern   1 G
Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir   1  
Pteridium aquilinum Bracken Fern   1  
Rubus armeniacus Himalayan Blackberry 1   G
Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry     G
Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry   1  
Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry   1 G
Sambucus racemosa ssp. pubens Red Elderberry   1  
Thuja plicata Western red-cedar   1  
Tiarella trifoliata Threeleaf foamflower   1  
Trientalis borealis ssp. latifolia Western starflower   1  
Trillium ovatum Western Trillium   1  
Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock   1  
Urtica dioica Stinging Nettle     G
Vaccinium parvifolium Red Huckleberry   1  
Vancouveria hexandra Inside-out Flower   1

Key: “1” in Inv column indicates the plant is considered invasive. “1” in TFT column indicates the plant is listed in the Target Forest Type description for the 91st St. Slope. “G” or “R” in the So. Slope column indicates the plant has been observed growing or has been planted as part of restoration activities.

14 plant species have been observed growing in the South Slope HMU. Of these, seven (50%) are invasive. Of the 26 plants listed in the target forest type, five (19%) have been observed growing in the South Slope HMU.

Invasive Removal and Restoration Plan

Figure 2: The South Slope

Subarea A is to the east; Subarea B is to the west.

Subarea A is to the east; Subarea B is to the west.

Subarea A

Subarea A lies between the property lines of Olympic Terrace and the Headwaters Bowl. This means it will be affected by the work done in Subarea D of the Headwaters Bowl. It also lies above the seeps in the HWB that will receive some of the attention of the Stewardship Grant. Work here will have to be coordinated with these other projects.

The northern reaches of Subarea A have received numerous tree and shrub plantings in the last two years. These appear to have established well. Unfortunately, we did not keep accurate records, so we do not have accurate mortality rates.

In the parts of Subarea A that have been explored, there are few invasive plants. The efforts here will be to control what invasiveness is there and add to diversity, particularly at the shrub and groundcover layers.

Suggested Tasks for Subarea A:

  • Continue exploration and control of existing invasives. This can be done by forest stewards.
  • Monitor plantings for survival and growth. Replenish as necessary. Plant trees for buttressing in the lower sections; above that, plant shrubs for diversity and to maintain view corridors into the park from Olympic Terrace.
  • Coordinate work in Subarea A with the Stewardship Grant from the Washington Native Plant Society (HWB Subarea B) and with the homeowners of Olympic Terrace (HWB Subarea D) as necessary.

Subarea B

Trailside reaches of Subarea B are accessible to forest stewards and volunteers. There is a stand of Rubus parviflorus (Thimbleberry) along the trailside that can be spread through berry spreading and live staking.

Suggested Tasks for Subarea B:

  • Spread the Rubus parviflorus (Thimbleberry) with a mixture of berries and live stakes.
  • Attend to the trailside weeds such as Lapsana communis (nipplewort) and Cicerbita muralis (wall lettuce).
  • Subarea B cannot receive crew attention until water control efforts on the South Plateau have improved.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (me meh)

Description

The 91st St. Slope is a long, narrow strip that runs between the main social trail at the lower end and property lines at the upper. It is 23,313 square feet. Because of its steepness, it’s relatively unexplored.

The southeast corner is known as “Knotweed Hill” because it had a thicket of Reynoutria japonica (Japanese knotweed) that was treated in 2012. There is some knotweed resurgence that has been reported and is being monitored. For the full story of Knotweed Hill, please see “Park and Restoration History.”

The majority of the 91st St. Slope has no conifer canopy and less than 1% conifer regeneration. However, at the north end, where the 91st St. Slope abuts the 92nd St. wetlands, there is close to 10% Tsuga heterophylla (Western hemlock).

The target forest type for the 91st St. Slope is Tsuga heterophylla – Pseudotsuga menziesii/Polystichum munitum – Dryopteris expansa (Western hemlock – Douglas fir/Sword fern – Spreading wood fern; TSHE-PSME/POMU-DREX). The reference ecosystem is Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest.

Water Flow

One section of the trail bordering the 91st St. Slope dips below the water table. No other water flow has been observed from the 91st St. Slope.

Vegetation

Trailside, there are canopy gaps along this HMU that encourage the growth of blackberry and even grasses. There are dense laurel thickets, which were treated in the summer of 2014 with stem injection. Most of the rest of the trailside vegetation is Rubus armeniacus (blackberry) with Hedera helix (ivy) and some Rubus ursinus (trailing blackberry).

In October, 2012, three Alnus rubra (Red alder) trees fell from the 91st St. Slope across the main social trail and into a laurel thicket. This enlarged a canopy gap and blocked the trail until February, 2013, when it was cleared by the Natural Area Crew.

Because of the steepness of the rise from the trail, it’s difficult to see what is on the slope. The 91st St. Slope still has some trees that need ivy survival rings, but they are on nearly vertical sections of the slope.

No systematic monitoring has been done for the 91st St. Slope. However, what we have observed growing is listed in Table 1, below. Please see the key below the table for an explanation.

Table 1: Plants observed growing on the 91st St. Slope.

Scientific Name Common Name Inv TFT 91st Slope
Abies grandis Grand Fir   1 R
Acer circinatum Vine maple   1  
Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple   1 G
Alnus rubra Red Alder   1 G
Asarum caudatum Wild ginger     R
Athyrium filix-femina Lady Fern   1  
Blechnum spicant Deer Fern   1  
Bromus vulgaris Columbia brome   1  
Carex deweyana Dewey’s sedge   1  
Claytonia sibirica var. sibirica Siberian spring beauty     G
Corylus cornuta Beaked Hazelnut   1  
Daphne laureola Spurge Laurel 1   G
Dryopteris expansa Spiny Wood Fern   1  
Galium aparine Bedstraw     G
Galium triflorum Sweet-scented bedstraw   1  
Gaultheria shallon Salal   1  
Hedera helix English Ivy 1   G
Hydrophyllum tenuipes Pacific Waterleaf     G
Ilex aquifolium English Holly 1   G
Impatiens glandulifera Policeman’s helmet 1   G
Lonicera involucrata Twinberry     R
Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon-grape   1 G
Malus fusca Pacific Crab Apple     R
Oemleria cerasiformis Osoberry (Indian plum)     G
Osmorhiza berteroi Sweet Cicely     G
Polystichum munitum Sword Fern   1 G
Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir   1  
Pteridium aquilinum Bracken Fern   1  
Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup 1   G
Reynoutria japonica Japanese Knotweed 1   G
Rosa gymnocarpa Baldhip rose     R
Rosa nutkana Nootka rose     R
Rubus armeniacus Himalayan Blackberry 1   G
Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry   1 G
Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry   1 G
Rumex occidentalis Western dock     G
Sambucus racemosa ssp. pubens Red Elderberry   1 G
Taxus brevifolia Pacific Yew     G
Thuja plicata Western red-cedar   1 G
Tiarella trifoliata Threeleaf foamflower   1  
Tolmiea menziesii Piggyback Plant     G
Trientalis borealis ssp latifolia Western starflower   1  
Trillium ovatum Western Trillium   1  
Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock   1  
Urtica dioica Stinging Nettle     G
Vaccinium parvifolium Red Huckleberry   1  
Vancouveria hexandra Inside-out Flower   1

Key: Bold plant names indicate plants listed in a target forest type but not observed growing in any HMU. “1” in Inv column indicates the plant is considered invasive. “1” in TFT column indicates the plant is listed in the Target Forest Type description for the 91st St. Slope. “G” or “R” in the 91st St. Slope column indicates the plant has been observed growing or has been planted as part of restoration activities.

Of the 30 plant species observed growing in the 91st St. Slope HMU, seven (23%) are invasive. Of the 26 plants listed in the target forest type for the 91st St. Slope, nine (34.6%) are found growing in the HMU. These numbers would probably change with systematic observation.

Invasive Removal and Restoration Plan

Figure 1: 91st St. Slope

A: Accessible to volunteers. B: Contract Crew.

A: Accessible to volunteers. B: Contract Crew.

Subarea A

Subarea A measures 9,400 square feet and is accessible to all volunteers. It is separated from a similar volunteer-accessible area in the Central Valley HMU by a narrow social trail.

EarthCorps, in the fall of 2013, did some invasive removal in the Central Valley adjacent to the 91st St. Slope, reaching to about the dogleg in Figure 1, above.

In the winter of 2014, Friends of North Beach Park leap-frogged this restored area and cleared about 800 square feet on both sides of the trail of blackberry brambles.

Our intention was to continue clearing back towards the EarthCorps-cleared area over the summer months. However, in May and June we instead worked on aftercare for plants installed in dryer areas of the park, particularly near the entrance. In August, we did some re-clearing because the area had had a resurgence of invasives, particularly Ranunculus repens (creeping buttercup).

In August, a contract crew from the Parks Department injected a laurel stand with herbicide.

In November, Friends of North Beach Park cleared and planted in the area. Most of the plants were installed on the Central Valley side of the trail.

Suggested tasks for Subarea A:

  • Survey the area to be cleared between where the Friends of North Beach Park worked in January 2014 and EarthCorps worked in Fall of 2013.
  • Plan a series of public and forest steward workparties to bring the two areas together.
  • Work closer to the trail during wet weather, move to the streambank in the summer.
  • Use burlap and mulch to cover bare areas.
  • Use GSP provided plants to fill in in the fall.

The tasks above were written in the summer of 2014. As of the fall of 2014, work on the 91st St. Slope has been demoted in favor of concentrating on the Headwaters Bowl.

Subarea B

Subarea B is unexplored as of fall 2014. It is lower priority than the South or West Slopes, which have a much higher extent of invasion; consequently, there is no crew time scheduled or predicted for this subarea.

Suggested tasks for Subarea B:

  • Explore as much as possible.
  • Put survival rings on any trees that need them.

References

Green Seattle Partnership, 2014. GSP Reference Map on ArcGIS.com. http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9be9415001144aa383e5b86e481d2c45&extent=-122.5312,47.374,-121.7945,47.7577 Dates of accession various.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (me meh)

Description

The North Slope starts at the main entrance to the park and runs between the main trail and NW 90th St., as it rises up to 25th Ave. from 24th Ave. At 1.14 acres, it is the third largest HMU in North Beach Park.

The trail side has vertical stretches, with bare dirt and roots exposed. These stretches occasionally have heavy trees on top of them. These have been protected with wattles (burlap sacks half-filled with woodchips) held in place with ninebark stakes.
Further into the park, some of the trailside reaches of the slope widen out and become more volunteer accessible. There is still a lot of slope above the accessible areas, however.

The percent tree cover is about 85% deciduous, almost exclusively Acer macrophyllum (Big leaf maple); 5-10% is Thuja plicata (Western red-cedar), and the remaining 5-10% is gaps. The regenerating tree cover is less than 5% deciduous and less than 1% conifer.

The target forest type for the North Slope is Tsuga heterophylla – Pseudotsuga menziesii/Polystichum munitum – Dryopteris expansa (Western hemlock – Douglas fir/Sword fern – Spreading wood fern; TSHE-PSME/POMU-DREX). The reference ecosystem is Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest.

Water Flow

The coniferous tree canopy over most of the North Slope is dense enough that it intercepts most of the water that would fall onto the slope. However, there are places where water flows from the North Slope onto the main trail during heavy rains. The main trail could use some water bars to help deal with this situation.

Furthermore, there are bare places in the groundcover that should get some attention. See “Invasive Removal and Restoration Plan” below.

In the summer of 2013, the Parks Department Natural Area Crew put coir logs underneath the intersection of 90th St. and 25th Ave.

Figure 1: Coir logs on the North Slope.

Side view of erosion control. A narrow trench was dug at the top of the slope, the netting was laid in and staked with 2x2 stakes, and then the trench was reburied.

Side view of erosion control. A narrow trench was dug at the top of the slope, the netting was laid in and staked with 2×2 stakes, and then the trench was reburied.

Vegetation

No invasive plants had established an area of monoculture on the North Slope. What is visible from the trail is a canopy of Acer macrophyllum (Big leaf maple) and a shrub layer of Polystichum munitum (Sword fern) and Mahonia nervosa (Low Oregon-grape). This association is encouraged through occasional spreading of Mahonia berries.

Observed during the belt transect (see below) was a stand of Holodiscus discolor (Ocean spray), the first observed in the main body of the park, and the only known instance of Stellaria crispa (Crisp sandwort) that we know of in the park. (Neither of these were in a transect plot.) The upper reaches of the North Slope have many daffodils, bluebells and other garden plants and escaped ornamentals.

The June, 2014 belt transect laterally crossed the North Slope; eight plots were established from the trailside up to the street end. See “Monitoring” for a full discussion of the belt transect protocol. Most of the area crossed by the transect had received some restoration, by volunteers at the lower end and Natural Area Crew at the upper end.

Table 1, below, shows the target forest type indicator species for the North Slope and all species found in our survey. Please see the Key, below the table, for a full explanation of the numbers.

Table 1: Target forest type and transect species for the North Slope

Binomial Common Name % Cover TFT Goal
Abies grandis Grand fir 0.06 14.00
Acer circinatum Vine maple 0.00 20.00
Acer macrophyllum Big leaf maple 83.88 18.00
Aesculus hippocastanum Horse chestnut 0.06 0.00
Alnus rubra red alder 11.25 9.00
Athyrium filix-femina Lady fern 2.00 2.00
Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon-grape 11.38 4.00
Blechnum spicant Deer fern 0.00 2.00
Bromus vulgaris Columbia brome 0.00 2.00
Calystegia sepium false bindweed 0.13 0.00
Carex deweyana Dewey’s Sedge 0.00 2.00
Claytonia sibirica Siberian miner’s lettuce 0.38  
Corylus cornuta Beaked hazelnut 0.38 3.00
Cymbalaria muralis Kenilworth ivy 0.06 0.00
Dryopteris expansa Spiny wood fern 0.00 3.00
Eurhynchium oreganum Oregon beaked moss 0.13  
Galium aparine cleavers 0.44  
Galium triflorum Sweet-scented bedstraw 0.00 2.00
Gaultheria shallon Salal 0.00 2.00
Geranium robertianum Robert’s geranium 0.81 0.00
Geum macrophyllum Large-leaved avens 0.06  
Hedera helix English Ivy 1.63 0.00
Holcus lanatus velvet grass 0.06 0.00
Hyacinthoides hispanica Bluebells 0.13 0.00
Hydrophyllum tenuipes Pacific waterleaf 7.19  
Lapsana communis Nipplewort 0.75 0.00
Lunaria annua Silver dollar 0.13 0.00
Moss   1.63  
Mycelis muralis Wall lettuce 0.81 0.00
Oemlaria cerasiformis Indian plum 0.06  
Oenanthe sarmentosa Water parsley 0.13  
Osmorhiza berteroi Sweet cicely 0.31  
Polystichum munitum sword fern 12.88 54.00
Prunus avium Bird cherry 0.63 0.00
Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir 0.00 45.00
Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken fern 0.00 3.00
Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup 0.06 0.00
Ribes sanguineum Red flowering currant 0.19  
Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry 0.06 4.00
Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry 0.19 3.00
Sambucus racemosa Red elderberry 0.06 2.00
Symphoricarpus albus Snowberry 0.13  
Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinale Common Dandelion 0.06 0.00
Tellima grandiflora Fringecup 0.19  
Thuja plicata Western red-cedar 0.00 33.00
Tiarella trifoliata var. trifoliata Threeleaf foamflower 0.00 5.00
Tolmiea menziesii Piggyback 0.75  
Trientalis borealis ssp. latifolia Western starflower 0.00 1.00
Trillium ovatum Western trillium 0.06 1.00
Tsuga heterophylla Hemlock 0.06 36.00
Urtica dioica Stinging nettle 12.00  
Vaccinium parvifolium Red huckleberry 0.00 3.00
Vancouveria hexandra Inside out flower 0.00 7.00

Key: “0.00” in Pct. Cover column indicates a target forest type indicator species not found during the survey. No value in the TFT Goal column indicates a native species not listed in the target forest type. “0.00” in the TFT Goal column indicates an invasive species to be removed.

Invasive Removal and Restoration Plan

Figure 2: North Slope

A: Trailside, less-steep area accessible to volunteers. B: Slope area to be worked on by Natural Area crew.

A: Trailside, less-steep area accessible to volunteers. B: Slope area to be worked on by Natural Area crew.

Subarea A

Subarea A measures approximately 13,200 feet. Volunteers can work in the trailside sections and along some of the more gradual slopes at the western edge. Of particular interest are gullies and washes that form from the steeper parts of the slope. These could be controlled with dikes and careful live staking and planting at the lower sections, and coir logs or other erosion control methods above. The soil in these washes is uncompacted, and likely to slip if too heavily stepped on.

Trailside sections of Subarea A have received plantings every year, by both Natural Area Crew and volunteers. The western edge of Subarea A has received plantings of Abies grandis (Grand fir) and Tsuga heterophylla (Western hemlock).

Suggested tasks for Subarea A:

  • Continue spreading Mahonia grapes, as possible.
  • Add dikes and wattles to areas experiencing erosion. Live stake above the wattles.
  • Plant trees along the lower reaches of the slopes to provide buttressing.

Subarea B

Subarea B measures nearly 36,400 square feet. The rim along 90th St. has received some plants and mulch from volunteers. Below the rim, the Parks Department Natural Area Crew did invasive removal (by hand), erosion control, and planting in 2013.

Forest stewards can visually monitor this area from the street rim and the trail, but further work in this area will have to be done by the Natural Area Crew.

References

Green Seattle Partnership, 2014. GSP Reference Map on ArcGIS.com. http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9be9415001144aa383e5b86e481d2c45&extent=-122.5312,47.374,-121.7945,47.7577 Dates of accession various.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

holyoutlaw: (me meh)

Green Seattle Partnership splits each park into different zones called “habitat management units” (HMUs). This allows GSP to assign different target forest types and reference ecosystems to the different HMUs, and the forest stewards to use techniques and approaches best suited to each HMU.

North Beach Park is split into 11 HMUs; nine of these are discussed in this document. The other two are only accessible by crossing private property lines.

The HMUs were delineated by Nelson Salisbury and Ella Elman when they mapped North Beach Park for EarthCorps in late summer of 2011. The names of the HMUs were decided by the forest stewards. All of the names are descriptive in some way.

The HMUs in North Beach Park are based on two basic characteristics: slopes and uplands, and wetlands. There is some mixture in that all the wetland areas contain some upland slopes, and the upland areas frequently contain some seeps or wet areas in their lower regions.

Within these two divisions, slopes and uplands are assigned their name based on nearby property (ie, Fletcher’s Slope is below Fletcher’s Village; 91st St. Slope is below 91st St.; 92nd St. Wetlands is below 92nd St.), characteristics (the South Plateau is the largest flat area of the park and 80 feet above the rest of the park), or aspect (South Slope, West Slope, North Slope). The Headwaters Bowl is where the groundwater enters the park and begins to form the stream; the Central Valley is in the middle of the park.

Each of these HMUs received a reference ecosystem at the time of mapping, based on broad category of the plant species seen. There are two reference ecosystems for NBP: “mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest” and “riparian forest and shrubland.” These are based on NatureServe classifications.

The table below shows the nine HMUs discussed in this book sorted by size, and listed with their target forest type and reference ecosystem. The target forest types are explained in “Target Forest Types,” next week.

Name Size Target Forest Type Reference ecosystem
Central Valley 1.97 ALRU/RUSP/CAOB-LYAM Riparian forest and shrubland
Headwaters Bowl 1.39 ALRU/RUSP/CAOB-LYAM Riparian forest and shrubland
North Slope 1.14 TSHE-PSME/POMU/DREX Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest
West Slope 0.84 TSHE-PSME/POMU/DREX Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest
South Slope 0.76 TSHE-PSME/POMU/DREX Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest
92nd St. Wetlands 0.69 THPL-TSHE/OPHO/POMU Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest
South Plateau 0.57 TSHE-PSME/POMU/DREX Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest
91st St. Slope 0.54 TSHE-PSME/POMU/DREX Mesic-moist conifer and conifer-deciduous mixed forest
Fletcher’s Slope 0.53 TSHE-THPL-ACMA/ACCI/LYAM Riparian forest and shrubland

The Central Valley, Headwaters Bowl, and 92nd St. Wetlands are all primarily wetlands and are discussed first. The other six HMUs are primarily uplands and slopes and are discussed after the wetlands. Within each category, the HMUs are discussed in the order of greatest amount of restoration effort they have received.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

Profile

holyoutlaw: (Default)
holyoutlaw

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags